olhon.info Religion Distributed Component Architecture Ebook

DISTRIBUTED COMPONENT ARCHITECTURE EBOOK

Friday, May 31, 2019


Distributed Software Systems are subject to frequent changes. Middleware plays an important role in the development of evolvable systems. RMI, CORBA. Buy Distributed Component Architecture: Read Books Reviews - olhon.info olhon.info: Distributed Systems for System Architects (Advances in Distributed Computing and Middleware Book 1) eBook: Paulo Veríssimo, Luís or server programs, Java applets or pro tocol modules, to those hardware components.


Distributed Component Architecture Ebook

Author:TAJUANA GIOTTONINI
Language:English, Spanish, Portuguese
Country:Chad
Genre:Technology
Pages:445
Published (Last):24.06.2016
ISBN:826-7-68231-414-3
ePub File Size:22.33 MB
PDF File Size:9.69 MB
Distribution:Free* [*Regsitration Required]
Downloads:37757
Uploaded by: ALICIA

The 45 best software architecture ebooks, such as Beyond Legacy Code, Clean how to organize your entities using components, and take advantage of the CPUs the design and implementation of any distributed software architecture. Chapter 2: Key Principles of Software Architecture. 9 .. Step 3 – Decide How to Distribute Layers and Components. .. Layered Component Distribution. Download this e-book to learn how to efficiently build distributed systems. Use the included patterns components to develop scalable, reliable.

Further segmentation would allow an increase in parallelization which would potentially offer performance improvements. The trade off, of course, is that this approach also increases complexity and, potentially, makes them harder to manage and to make secure. Reliability In high stakes enterprise environments, solution reliability is essential.

Designing Distributed Systems

The developer must consider when it is acceptable to force people to re-enter data, re-run a function, or when a function can be unavailable. Database developers ran into this issue in the s and developed the concept of an atomic function. That is, the function must complete or the partial updates must be rolled back leaving the data in the state it was in before the function began.

This same mindset must be applied to distributed systems to ensure that data integrity is maintained even in the event of service failures and transaction disruptions. Functions must be designed to totally complete or roll back intermediate updates. In critical message passing systems, messages must be stored until an acknowledgement that a message has been received comes in. Manageability Although not as much fun to consider as the core application functionality, manageability is a key factor in the ongoing success of the application.

All distributed functions must be fully instrumented to allow administrators to both understand the current state of each function and to change function parameters if needed. Distributed systems, after all, are constructed of many more moving parts than the monolithic systems they replace. Developers must be constantly aware of making this distributed computing environment easy to use and maintain.

This brings us to the absolute requirement that all distributed functions must be fully instrumented to allow administrators to understand their current state. After all, distributed systems are inherently more complex and have more moving parts than the monolithic systems they replace. Security Distributed system security is an order of magnitude more difficult than security in a monolithic environment. Each function must be made secure separately and the communication links between and among the functions must also be made secure.

As the network grows in size and complexity, developers must consider how to control access to functions, how to make sure than only authorized users can access these function, and to to isolate services from one other.

Security is a critical element that must be built into every function, not added on later. Unauthorized access to functions and data must be prevented and reported. Privacy Privacy is the subject of an increasing number of regulations around the world. HIPPA regulations are important considerations for any developer of customer-facing systems. Mastering Complexity Developers must take the time to consider how all of the pieces of a complex computing environment fit together.

It is hard to maintain the discipline that a service should encapsulate a single function or, perhaps, a small number of tightly interrelated functions.

If a given function is implemented in multiple places, maintaining and updating that function can be hard. Finding that error can be very challenging. This means it is wise for developers of complex applications to maintain a visual model that shows where each function lives so it can be updated if regulations or business requirements change.

To be successful as a architect of distributed systems, a developer must be able to master complexity. Approaches Developers Must Master Developers must master decomposing and refactoring application architectures, thinking in terms of teams, and growing their skill in approaches to rapid application development and deployment DevOps.

After all, they must be able to think systematically about what functions are independent of one another and what functions rely on the output of other functions to work. Functions that rely upon one other may be best implemented as a single service. The results conclude that the proposed solution implements a lightweight communication protocol for mobile robot applications that avoids transmission delays and overhead.

Keywords: mobile robots, distributed control, CAN bus, software agents, software components 1. Introduction Mobile robots need very reliable navigation capabilities to operate for long periods of time autonomously. The navigation system is one of the main parts of a control architecture, but its performance will always depend on the information quality gathered from the sensors and provided to the actuators.

Therefore, to design a reliable application based on mobile robots it is necessary to have a robust sensor integration and hardware control system.

The information provided by some sensors can be critical and must be managed according to the control process that makes use of it. Obstacle avoidance, localization or map construction are critical tasks while head pan-tilt movement or voice synthesizer are usually non-critical.

The current wide range of mobile robot architectures leads to different approaches in the organization of these tasks, and also in the information management in the lower layers where the hardware is connected. Most architectures split the different tasks in several layers.

In the same control system, more than one module can make use of the same information; it can also be used in different levels.

For example, one module can use raw data from a sensor and another one can use it filtered through another module that synchronizes it with other sensor information.

This complexity in the information handling could lead to a high computational load if the hardware layer is not well integrated into the control architecture. Over the last decades, as a result of the efforts made in the field of mobile robots, different solutions and implementations of robot control architectures have been proposed. Nowadays, the main research topics in this field are focusing on robotics development environments, designed to create applications based on mobile robots.

Some of these environments contain a control architecture and tools to develop new modules, to improve control algorithms or to debug the current system [ 1 ], while others do not implement a specific control architecture. Instead, they have the necessary tools to build it, including communication systems, configuration and management modules, graphic interfaces and programming libraries. These architectures and environments generally tend to ignore the hardware development.

They are centered only on the software, implementing the interface with the hardware devices using a communication library over standard interfaces such as Ethernet, serial or USB Universal Serial Bus.

The aim of this work is to create a modular architecture for distributed hardware control and sensor data integration in the field of mobile robots. Some previous works in the field of robotics deal with the same problem proposed in this article.

Buying Options

In [ 4 ], a modular, distributed and scalable architecture for spacecraft avionics is presented. The solution proposed by the authors relies on the use of autonomous distributed units, in charge of specific tasks and interconnected with a fiber optics communication bus. Every distributed unit follows a similar design concept using common board dimensions, enclosures and also some power converter design. These previous approaches are centered on the creation of reusable units to improve reliability and robustness, decreasing the development cost at the same time.

This allows to avoid testing and debugging complex hardware designs by dividing the work between distributed hardware modules. The solution proposed in this work consists of a set of distributed hardware modules to integrate sensor data, manage the actuators and also perform distributed control. The main difference between the previously mentioned works and our proposed solution is the embedded software of every distributed hardware module.

Every hardware module is based on a microcontroller unit and the software is developed under an agent—component design paradigm. For several years, researchers in the field of computer engineering and robotics have been exploring configurations based on software agents and components. The results are control architectures such as DCF Distributed Control Framework [ 6 ], where a deep analysis of distributed control software agent development is done, [ 7 ] or [ 8 ] with a component-oriented design for distributed real-time control systems.

Component software development has also been applied to industrial environments [ 9 ], proving the robustness of systems obtained with this design paradigm.

Even though a lot of solutions have been developed, few of them are related to embedded programming, and most of them are distributed but implemented in general purpose computers. Privacy Statement.

Microsoft may use your contact information to provide updates and special offers about Microsoft Azure and other Microsoft products and services. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Diones mendes

To learn more, read the privacy statement. I will receive information, tips, and offers about Azure and other Microsoft products and services. I'd like to receive updates, tips, and offers from Microsoft, and it's OK for Microsoft to share my information with select partners so I can receive relevant information about their products and services.

Privacy statement.A container represents something that hosts code or data. Diagramming GUI-based On-premises. Is a specific development language better for that function?

Distributed and Modular CAN-Based Architecture for Hardware Control and Sensor Data Integration

Creating multiple diagrams, one per "slice", can help, although the resulting diagrams tend to be very simple and increase the effort needed to keep them up to date. Containers, another approach to processing virtualization, are the emerging choice today because they offer similar levels of isolation, the ability to restart and migrate functions and consume far less processing power, memory or storage.

He's interested in system software, virtualization technology, cloud computing, and mobility. See example diagram, key, and narrative. CAN bus protocols are widely employed in vehicles and other applications that include a considerable number of interconnected devices [ 11 ].

Approaches Developers Must Master Developers must master decomposing and refactoring application architectures, thinking in terms of teams, and growing their skill in approaches to rapid application development and deployment DevOps.

Other books: CAIRO TRILOGY EBOOK